message+method+art (tm)

Blog

Top Fortune 500 Logos Deconstructed

Published on by Matthew LaPointe in Graphics - Marketing

The logos of the top 100 companies on the 2010 Fortune 500 list are more alike than you might think at first glance. In this post I hope to uncover a few elements that are common, illuminate certain groupings, and hopefully help you think about your logo in the context of your brand a little differently.

Disclaimer: Before I get started I should point out each of the below logos was pulled in an effort to capture the most standard version of the logo each company uses. I’m sure a few are off, but for the purposes of discussing principles of logo design these will suffice.

2010 Fortune 100 company logos

While the logos of 2010's Fortune 100 may appear quite different at first glance, as we look a little closer a number of patterns emerge.

Logo design is mostly an art, but it is governed by practical rules that include proportion, scale, reproducibility, context, and other factors. Logo design also tends to reflect industry values. Consumer brands tend to have more stylized, iconic designs, whereas business-to-business or supply chain companies are less focused on this.

Proportions

There are typically three classes of proportion when it comes to logo design – a square, a tall rectangle, and a wide rectangle. Most people avoid tall rectangular logos because they are difficult to incorporate into a wide variety of design applications, though in some limited circumstances they can work well. How do the top Fortune 500 companies see it? The majority, about seven out of ten, have opted to use the wide rectangle. The remaining use square designs. None use a vertical design as a primary application.

Proportions of Fortune 100 company logos.

The proportions of most logos fall into three categories: square, horizontal rectangle, and vertical rectangle. Above is a rough breakdown of how 2010's Fortune 100 fit into these categories.

Color Choice

The graphs below speak fairly clearly for themselves: the Fortune 100 companies analyzed prefer blue (to include a few deep purples) followed by red and black. Of all the color choices three-fourths of the time one of those was chosen.

There are books written on the psychology of color discussing what emotion various hues evoke, but pressing on to the core of it this is what I think – blue is chosen because it is calming, and a preferred color by many. It is also lends itself well to various shades of itself. If you have a deep blue as your primary logo color you can use a 50% screen of the same and it works well.

This particular attribute cannot be said about the next most popular color, red. Screens of red are only used by a few, because a screen of red is pink. Red is chosen because it is bold and stands out well in signage. The sky is rarely red and often blue. Take a look at the companies that chose red as their primary color and think about the most important application for them, outdoor signage.

Black is chosen because it works well with just about any other color and is very clear. The most important aspect of a logo is to communicate your name. It is only art secondarily. I found it somewhat surprising how little green was used. I suspect that with the current green movement this will change over the coming years as new companies rise and old companies refresh their looks.

2010 Fortune 100 logos broken down by hue and color count.

The vast majority of the 2010 Fortune 100 companies' primary logos consist of 1 or 2 color designs. Three quarters include a shade of blue, red, and black.

Color Count

The perspective on color count couldn’t be clearer: don’t use more than one or two colors in your logo. A small number stray and use 3 (often a neutral such as black or gray is included in that) and the rest are clear outliers with 4 and 8 colors.

The reason for this is simple: cost and brand management. More colors cost more money to reproduce in many applications. I think the larger issue has to do with brands though. Most companies have multiple version of their logo, such as a monochrome version if their standard logo is two or three colors. But the more colors your logo has the more often you have to create style exceptions. The more colors a logo has the more difficult it is to include in designs because colors clash. When this happens designers often reach for an alternate (non-primary) version of the logo. Every time this occurs it is lost opportunity for brand reinforcement.

Logo Basics

Simple logos reproduce more consistently at small and large scales than intricate ones.

A few things to keep in mind when designing a logo:

  1. Basics: Keep it simple
  2. Color: Don’t use more than three colors
  3. Proportions: Consider a horizontal rectangular shape, else a square

The Fortune 100 companies shown above aren’t successful because of their logos. In fact, a few of the logos are downright awful. But, most of them realize that a strong logo is foundational to a strong brand.

3 Responses to Top Fortune 500 Logos Deconstructed


  1. [...] Top Fortune 500 Logos Deconstructed [...]


  2. R.G.B. says (2012-09-02 08:09 PM):

    Why so much Blue on the logos and buttons on websites?? Why can’t the buttons be Green.
    eBay logo is make up of the four Main colours. Red, Green, Blue, and Yellow.
    Infact R,G,B, Red, Green and Blue are the Main colours of the Spectrum of Light. Take out Green or take out Red and you would not be able to read what I am typing as easy as you do now.

    There is “too much” Blue on Websites. As well as RGB & Y there are “other” colours that could be used

    Purple, Pink, Burgundy etc. (Burgundy and Gold are a great combo). Choose from more than the Standard three colours to get “thee” colours combo mix, maximum two or three i.e. Green & Silver, Green & Purple, Green & Blue, and it’s the “Right Shade of Green has to be right” Medium to Light Green not Dark.

    My eye colour is Dark Blue so I have nothing against Blue but There is Too Much Use in post 2011 website design. I believe in “Balance” and Fair Play, one colour should not be dominant.
    I have Windows XP but I do not have Blue on the browsers (I’m fed up looking at blue this and blue that, it’s lost it’s value), I have the other colour “Olive” (Green). And “Green” Doesn’t Not Stand For “being a
    Nature lover”. As I say without the colour Green in Light you would not be able to “See” as you do now.
    It’s “Really Stupid” that All the websites are changing to Blue on them. Look at how many well know sites Logo are Blue: Facebook, Twitter, Microsoft and now Google etc. It Really Is Stupid to have only one
    Colour. So Common.
    Look at how many people in the Western World have Green eyes!!
    Look at how many people have more than one car colour in their life time, more than one house of a different colour. Would you buy Only Blue clothes all your life?!! “Change”.


  3. tdb says (2013-05-14 07:21 AM):

    this was very useful page im doing gcse dt graphic and this helped a lot


Leave a Reply

We welcome your feedback.